(It was created from flowing water 6 It came out from between solid and dust 7) (Al-Tariq

Dear reader, here is the attempt of the atheist fellow in criticizing the Qur’an, so he came to say

Interpretation of the first verse by Ibn Katheer:

Semen means a flow of semen from the man and from the woman, and the child is born from them with the permission of God, may He be glorified and glorified.

Interpretation of the second verse by Ibn Katheer:

It means the crucifixion of the man and the troubles of the woman, which is her chest. He said Shabib bin preached about Ikrima from Ibn Abbas, "comes out of the steel and the ribs" solid man Traib woman yellow thin is not the boy only of them, as well as Saeed bin Jabir said Sabri, and Qatada and Saddi and others said Ibn Abi Hatim told us Abu Said Ashajj told us Abu Osama for calorimeter heard The ruling mentioned on the authority of Ibn Abbas: “It comes out from between crucifixion and distress.” He said this distrust, and he placed his hand on his chest. Al-Dahhak and Atiyyah said on the authority of Ibn Abbas, the tirabeh of the woman, the position of the collar, and likewise, Akrama and Sa`id bin Jubayr. Ali bin Abi Talha said Ibn Abbas, the ribs between her breasts and Mujahid: ribs between the shoulders to the chest and it is also the ribs down from Thracian and said Sufian Revolutionary: above the breasts and Said bin Jubair ribs four sides of the bottom side and Dahhaak ribs between the breasts, legs and eyes said Laith bin Saad Muammar bin Abi Ajabibh civil that he heard in the words of God Almighty "comes out of the steel and the ribs," said a juice heart there is a boy and Qatada "comes out of the steel and the ribs" of the crucifixion and his throat.

First: Dear reader, note that this atheist came with the interpretation of Ibn Katheer, because in many subsequent cases we will see that he does not take the interpretation of any of the Muslim scholars, but rather does the interpretation himself ... and this is what we have been accustomed to always taking the one who supports in the phenomenon of the stable in his mind, but when he finds the interpretations That blew his likeness, he ignores her

Second: Come with me, dear readers, to see the suspicion of this atheist, to see the charity of his lies. Do these noble verses really contradict knowledge, or is his mind the one that contradicts knowledge as he says

Of course, there are several wholesale scientific errors, and not one mistake in the two following:

First error:

The saying that the woman’s water flowing from her contributes and, in parallel with the man’s, the formation of the fetus, and of course this is a gross mistake, for two reasons ..

First: The woman’s egg is responsible for giving the fetus half of its genetic genes and helping with formation, and the woman’s water does not come under this at all.

Second: A woman's water has only one function, which is to moisturize and lubricate the vagina to facilitate the entry of the man’s organ inside, and this water does not come out.

A wrong assumption made by this atheist without any evidence or proof ... and with this assumption he tried hard to deceive himself and deceive the simple people of his people to delude them all that what is meant by a woman's water here is the vaginal secretions that occur during intercourse ... What is his evidence for this and what is it His proof? ... Nothing but ignorance and arguing with falsehood to fight the doubt that burns his heart until he proves to himself that he is right with any kindness, even if by deceiving himself ...

I wish him to be satisfied with that, but soon he searched on the Internet for anything to indicate what is settled in his mind ... and he found a hadith of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace ... Because of his extraordinary intelligence, I think that this noble hadith is proof of his previous assumptions. ... But if he had read the noble hadith and his mind on one side ... and if he knew the characteristics of vaginal secretions and the characteristics of the egg and its color on the other side, all this wailing would suffice and he found that his resemblance was blown up.

So come with me, readers, to see whether the evidence of this atheist - the noble hadith - who was martyred supports his delusions or blows them up, here is the text of the hadith of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace

I came to ask you about something that no one of the people of the earth knew except a prophet or a man or two men. He said it will benefit you. If I told you, he said, “I hear with my ears.” I came to ask you about the boy. He said the man’s water is white and the woman’s water is yellow. The man then said, God willing, the Jew said, “You have believed that you are a prophet.” Then he left, so he left. The Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said: He asked me this about whom he asked me about and what I knew of nothing of it until God brought me to it.

This is the hadith of the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, describing a man’s water as white, and in another term a thick white ... and describing a woman’s water as yellow, and another yellow tender term, so we can see whether these characteristics apply to vaginal secretions or not.

Normal vaginal secretions that occur during sexual intercourse are usually white or transparent, sticky and odorless, and do not itch.

Source / characteristics of vaginal secretions

Are these properties consistent, O people of minds, with the characteristics of the water of the woman that the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, mentioned in his speech ...

The Almighty, dear reader, to see the characteristics mentioned by the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, apply to those with tangible scientific evidence that cannot be disputed except by the blind:

First: The Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, described the sperm as white and thick, and this of course is known to everyone who has passed the age of puberty ... But is it correct to call it man's water? ...

Answer: Yes

It is correct to call it man's water, and the reason for this is that the percentage of water in the formation of semen is very large, estimated at 92%, but that there are other sources that confirm that the percentage of water in the semen is estimated at about 96% and that the number of sperms in it does not exceed 2% and the rest Other materials ..

Is there any scientific evidence for that? The answer is yes. Read in this source there is its text

Speaking of its composition, semen is about 96 percent water, plus:

• Sperm, which account for about 2 percent of ejaculate volume.

• Fructose, fruit sugar, which nourishes sperm.

• Vitamin C, which helps keep sperm healthy.

Translation

Speaking of its composition, semen is about 96 percent water, plus:

• Sperm, which accounts for about 2% of the hormone volume.

• Fructose, fruit sugar that supplies sperm.

Vitamin C, which helps keep sperm healthy.

Second: The Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, spoke about the other water and called it the woman's water ... so what is this water?

Is it the vaginal secretions that occur during intercourse, as this atheist claimed? Or does it refer to a woman's egg? ... As for the claim of this atheist, it has been blown up previously, because these secretions do not apply to them the characteristics that the Messenger, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, stated that the woman’s water is yellow ...

So, there is nothing in front of us but the egg ... So do you think that the characteristics mentioned by the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, apply to it that they are water and that they are thin yellow?

Answer: Yes

This is because the water that carries the ovum and is yellow in color flows from the ovarian vesicle, and the egg itself is mainly composed of water and is yellow in color..It is surrounded by a thick layer of yellow-colored "follicular" cells ... and thin so that the sperm can penetrate it.

Is there any scientific evidence for that? Yes, there is, dear dear, read the following texts that confirm that a woman's egg is made of water

-a woman's egg is a single cell - the largest in the human body - composed primarily of water

Translation :
A woman's egg is a single cell - the largest in the human body - consisting mainly of water
Source / Here http://www.doctorsofusc.com/uscdocs/services/health-tips/fertility
- And also from another source it said
the human egg is the largest cell in the body and is composed mostly of water,

Translation :
The human egg is the largest cell in the body and is made up mostly of water

Source / here

http://www.eggfreezing.com/egg-freezing.html

As for the color of the egg, gentlemen, look at the following picture, which is a real picture of a woman’s egg exiting the ovary, and look at its color.

And to you this previous topic
http://antishobhat.blogspot.com/2012/08/blog-post_22.html

Thus, the suspicion of this atheist in this part has been blown up ... Let us see his sincerity or not in the other part, as he says:

Then you say

So the two verses tell that a person was created and created from flush water, that is, he comes out as a gush, from the man and the woman,

And the water comes out from the man’s back and the other water from the woman’s chest.

Whereas, the second verse explains to us that a man’s water comes out from his back while a woman’s water comes out from her soil, and it is, according to the agreement of all the commentators, the woman’s chest, and if they differ only whether it is the chest, the breastbone, the breasts, between the breasts, or the place of the necklace on her chest ..... Etc,

The professor here tried hard to convince the readers that the commentators agreed on the ta'rib that it is the woman’s chest and ignored what came in Ibn Katheer’s commentary about the difference between the people of tawwil as to what is meant by the ta'rib.

Ibn Katheer said that the woman is her chest

And Shabib bin Bishr, Saeed bin Jubair, Ikrimah, Qatada, Al-Sada, and others said, the woman's tareb is yellow and tender ... and they did not say the woman’s chest as this atheist claimed

Ibn Abi Hatim told us Abu Said Abu Osama Ashajj told us about calorimeter heard the referee said Ibn Abbas "come out of the steel and the ribs" These ribs and he put his hand on his chest ... Note that he put his hand on his chest and not women released

Al-Dahhak and Atiyyah said on the authority of Ibn Abbas, the position of the woman is the position of the collar ....

Ali bin Abi Talha said on the authority of Ibn Abbas, the traces between her breasts ....

And on the authority of Mujahid: The distress is between those who should obey al-Sadr, and from it also the distress is lower than al-Tarraqi ...

On the authority of Saeed bin Jabir At-Tariib, four sides from this lower side ....

And from the laughter, the distrust between the breasts, the feet, and the eyes ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

And on the authority of those who “come out from between crucifixion and distress” from between crucifixion and liberation ... crucifying and slaughtering him, and he does not mention the woman

Where is the agreement of all the commentators that I said about it and its color is red .. Why did you not take the one who said that the woman is tender yellow? ... and why did you not take the one who said: “What is between the two shoulders” is between the two shoulders, to the chest? ... And why did you not take the one who said the taraib is four sides? ... And why did you not take the one who said the tribe between the two men? ... And why did you not take the one who said from among the crucifixion of the man and slaughtered him? .... Why did you ignore all that? .. Or are you only looking for what supports the stable in your mind ...

What do you think if we took the opinion of those who said that the ribs are the ribs of a person, whether male or female - on the authority of Saeed bin Jabir At-Taraib four from this lower side - then the scientific explanation will be as follows:

The testicle and ovary consist of the genital hump between the core of the fetus and its tibials, the sclera is the backbone and the tibials are the ribs, and the testicle and ovary are precisely in this area, that is, between the sclera and the tibials, then the testicle descends gradually until it reaches the scrotum (outside the abdominal cavity) at the end of The seventh month of pregnancy, while the ovaries descend into the woman's pelvis .., and with this, the blood, nerve and lymph nourishment of the testicle and ovary remains from its origin, that is, between the sclera and the tibials, the testicular or ovarian artery comes from the aorta (abdominal aorta) from between the sclera and the lymphs. Also, the testicular vein flows in the same area, that is, between the sclera and the tibials, and the nerves feeding the testis or the ovary come from the nerve group located under the stomach from between the sclera and the tibials, as well as the lymphatic vessels pouring into the same area, that is, between the sclera and the tibials. After all this, is there any doubt that the testicle or ovary is only taking its nourishment, blood, and nerves from between the sclera and the corpus!

The spermatozoon of a man or the egg in a woman only derives the materials of its formation from between solid and corpus, and its origin and principle are from between solid and corpus, and the noble verse is a complete miracle, where it says: (from between crucifixion and formation), and it did not say from solid and corpus, so the word Bean "is not only rhetorical, but also gives infinite scientific accuracy.

Source / Creation of man between medicine and the Qur’an / Dr. Muhammad Ali al-Bar

So where is the contradiction after all this between science and true Islam ...

0